Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 15:52

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Some candidates focus on blocking Cuomo’s path a day before NYC’s mayoral primary - AP News
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ending Parole for 500,000 Migrants Creates New Headaches for Employers - WSJ
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Pokemon Scarlet And Violet's Free Switch 2 Update Is Now Live - GameSpot
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What are your funniest "lost in translation" moments if you grew up speaking more than one language?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Want $8,665 A Year In Passive Income, Invest $25,000 In These High Yield Stocks - 24/7 Wall St.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.